we waited for our government to do the right thing....

we waited for our government to do the right thing....

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

MICHAEL MOORE AND OTHERS HELP POST BAIL FOR JULIAN ASSANGE



NOBODY GIVES VOLTAIRE THE CREDIT FOR SAYING,"I DISAPPROVE OF WHAT YOU SAY, BUT I WILL DEFEND TO THE DEATH YOUR RIGHT TO SAY IT."

I DON'T CARE WHO SAID IT --I AGREE COMPLETELY. AND THUS I STAND BEHIND MICHAEL MOORE'S DECISION TO HELP RELEASE JULIAN ASSANGE FROM SOLITARY CONFINEMENT 'FOR HIS PROTECTION' WHILE AWAITING SPURIOUS 'RAPE' CHARGES IN SWEDEN DESIGNED TO EXTRADITE HIM INTO U.S. HANDS.

SECRECY IS THE STUFF OF WAR! ABRIDGMENT OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH IS ALL TOO COMMON. I APPLAUD MOORE'S STANCE.

>HERE'S WHAT MICHAEL MOORE HAS TO SAY ABOUT HIS DECISION: I HAVE PLACED IN BOLD FACE HIS MOST IMPORTANT STATEMENTS.

Why I'm Posting Bail Money for Julian Assange

By Michael Moore

December 14, 2010 "Information Clearing House" -- Yesterday, in the Westminster Magistrates Court in London, the lawyers for WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange presented to the judge a document from me stating that I have put up $20,000 of my own money to help bail Mr. Assange out of jail.

Furthermore, I am publicly offering the assistance of my website, my servers, my domain names and anything else I can do to keep WikiLeaks alive and thriving as it continues its work to expose the crimes that were concocted in secret and carried out in our name and with our tax dollars.

We were taken to war in Iraq on a lie. Hundreds of thousands are now dead. Just imagine if the men who planned this war crime back in 2002 had had a WikiLeaks to deal with. They might not have been able to pull it off. The only reason they thought they could get away with it was because they had a guaranteed cloak of secrecy. That guarantee has now been ripped from them, and I hope they are never able to operate in secret again.

So why is WikiLeaks, after performing such an important public service, under such vicious attack? Because they have outed and embarrassed those who have covered up the truth. The assault on them has been over the top:

**Sen. Joe Lieberman says WikiLeaks "has violated the Espionage Act."

**The New Yorker's George Packer calls Assange "super-secretive, thin-skinned, [and] megalomaniacal."

**Sarah Palin claims he's "an anti-American operative with blood on his hands" whom we should pursue "with the same urgency we pursue al Qaeda and Taliban leaders."

**Democrat Bob Beckel (Walter Mondale's 1984 campaign manager) said about Assange on Fox: "A dead man can't leak stuff ... there's only one way to do it: illegally shoot the son of a bitch."

**Republican Mary Matalin says "he's a psychopath, a sociopath ... He's a terrorist."

**Rep. Peter A. King calls WikiLeaks a "terrorist organization."

And indeed they are! They exist to terrorize the liars and warmongers who have brought ruin to our nation and to others. Perhaps the next war won't be so easy because the tables have been turned -- and now it's Big Brother who's being watched ... by us!

WikiLeaks deserves our thanks for shining a huge spotlight on all this.

But some in the corporate-owned press have dismissed the importance of WikiLeaks ("they've released little that's new!") or have painted them as simple anarchists ("WikiLeaks just releases everything without any editorial control!").

WikiLeaks exists, in part, because the mainstream media has failed to live up to its responsibility. The corporate owners have decimated newsrooms, making it impossible for good journalists to do their job. There's no time or money anymore for investigative journalism. Simply put, investors don't want those stories exposed. They like their secrets kept ... as secrets.

I ask you to imagine how much different our world would be if WikiLeaks had existed 10 years ago. Take a look at this photo.



That's Mr. Bush about to be handed a "secret" document on August 6th, 2001. Its heading read: "Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US."
And on those pages it said the FBI had discovered "patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings."
Mr. Bush decided to ignore it and went fishing for the next four weeks.

But if that document had been leaked, how would you or I have reacted? What would Congress or the FAA have done? Was there not a greater chance that someone, somewhere would have done something if all of us knew about bin Laden's impending attack using hijacked planes?

But back then only a few people had access to that document. Because the secret was kept, a flight school instructor in San Diego who noticed that two Saudi students took no interest in takeoffs or landings, did nothing. Had he read about the bin Laden threat in the paper, might he have called the FBI? (Please read this essay by former FBI Agent Coleen Rowley, Time's 2002 co-Person of the Year, about her belief that had WikiLeaks been around in 2001, 9/11 might have been prevented. SEE BELOW: JVB)

Or what if the public in 2003 had been able to read "secret" memos from Dick Cheney as he pressured the CIA to give him the "facts" he wanted in order to build his false case for war? If a WikiLeaks had revealed at that time that there were, in fact, no weapons of mass destruction, do you think that the war would have been launched -- or rather, wouldn't there have been calls for Cheney's arrest?

Openness, transparency -- these are among the few weapons the citizenry has to protect itself from the powerful and the corrupt. What if within days of August 4th, 1964 -- after the Pentagon had made up the lie that our ship was attacked by the North Vietnamese in the Gulf of Tonkin -- there had been a WikiLeaks to tell the American people that the whole thing was made up? I guess 58,000 of our soldiers (and 2 million Vietnamese) might be alive today.

Instead, secrets killed them.


For those of you who think it's wrong to support Julian Assange because of the sexual assault allegations he's being held for, all I ask is that you not be naive about how the government works when it decides to go after its prey.

Please -- never, ever believe the "official story."

And regardless of Assange's guilt or innocence (see the strange nature of the allegations here), this man has the right to have bail posted and to defend himself. I have joined with filmmakers Ken Loach and John Pilger and writer Jemima Khan in putting up the bail money -- and we hope the judge will accept this and grant his release today.

Might WikiLeaks cause some unintended harm to diplomatic negotiations and U.S. interests around the world? Perhaps. But that's the price you pay when you and your government take us into a war based on a lie. Your punishment for misbehaving is that someone has to turn on all the lights in the room so that we can see what you're up to. You simply can't be trusted. So every cable, every email you write is now fair game. Sorry, but you brought this upon yourself. No one can hide from the truth now. No one can plot the next Big Lie if they know that they might be exposed.

And that is the best thing that WikiLeaks has done. WikiLeaks, God bless them, will save lives as a result of their actions. And any of you who join me in supporting them are committing a true act of patriotism. Period.

I stand today in absentia with Julian Assange in London and I ask the judge to grant him his release. I am willing to guarantee his return to court with the bail money I have wired to said court. I will not allow this injustice to continue unchallenged.

P.S. You can read the statement I filed today in the London court here.

http://www.michaelmoore.com

===========

THE ESSAY ABOUT 9/11, WIKILEAKS, AND FBI AGENT ROWLEY:

WikiLeaks and 9/11: What if?
Frustrated investigators might have chosen to leak information that their superiors bottled up, perhaps averting the terrorism attacks.
October 15, 2010|By Coleen Rowley and Bogdan Dzakovic
If WikiLeaks had been around in 2001, could the events of 9/11 have been prevented? The idea is worth considering.

The organization has drawn both high praise and searing criticism for its mission of publishing leaked documents without revealing their source, but we suspect the world hasn't yet fully seen its potential. Let us explain.

There were a lot of us in the run-up to Sept. 11 who had seen warning signs that something devastating might be in the planning stages. But we worked for ossified bureaucracies incapable of acting quickly and decisively. Lately, the two of us have been wondering how things might have been different if there had been a quick, confidential way to get information out.

One of us, Coleen Rowley, was a special agent/legal counsel at the FBI's Minneapolis division and worked closely with those who arrested would-be terrorist Zacarias Moussaoui on an immigration violation less than a month before the World Trade Center was destroyed.

Following up on a tip from flight school instructors who had become suspicious of the French Moroccan who claimed to want to fly a jet as an "ego boost," Special Agent Harry Samit and an INS colleague had detained Moussaoui. A foreign intelligence service promptly reported that he had connections with a foreign terrorist group, but FBI officials in Washington inexplicably turned down Samit's request for authority to search Moussaoui's laptop computer and personal effects.

Those same officials stonewalled Samit's supervisor, who pleaded with them in late August 2001 that he was "trying to keep someone from taking a plane and crashing into the World Trade Center." (Yes, he was that explicit.) Later, testifying at Moussaoui's trial, Samit testified that he believed the behavior of his FBI superiors in Washington constituted "criminal negligence."

The 9/11 Commission ultimately concluded that Moussaoui was most likely being primed as a Sept. 11 replacement pilot and that the hijackers probably would have postponed their strike if information about his arrest had been announced.

WikiLeaks might have provided a pressure valve for those agents who were terribly worried about what might happen and frustrated by their superiors' seeming indifference. They were indeed stuck in a perplexing, no-win ethical dilemma as time ticked away. Their bosses issued continual warnings against "talking to the media" and frowned on whistle-blowing, yet the agents felt a strong need to protect the public.

Moore's statement to the court:

December 14th, 2010 2:58 AM
WITNESS STATEMENT OF MICHAEL MOORE
WITNESS STATEMENT

(CJ Act 1967, s.9 MC Act 1980, ss.5A(3)(a) and 5B;

Criminal Procedure Rules 2010, Rule 27)

____________________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF MICHAEL MOORE

Aged: Over 18

Occupation: FILM MAKER AND AUTHOR

____________________________________________________________________________

This statement (consisting of 2 pages each signed by me) is true to the best of my knowledge and belief and I make it knowing that, if it is tendered in evidence, I shall be liable to prosecution if I have wilfully stated anything which I know to be false or do not believe to be true.

I, MICHAEL MOORE, care of Finers Stephens Innocent, 179 Great Portland Street, London, W1W 5LS make this statement and say as follows:

1. I am a filmmaker, author and political commentator and I produce as my exhibit [MM/1] evidence of my identity in the form of a photocopy of my passport/driving licence. I am an American citizen.

2. I am aware of the various allegations Julian Assange faces in Sweden. I am willing to act as security for Julian in the sum of twenty thousand dollars USD$20,000.

3. I am the director and producer of Bowling for Columbine, Fahrenheit 9/11, Sicko, and Capitalism: A Love Story, four of the top nine highest-grossing documentaries of all time. In September 2008, I released my first free movie on the Internet, Slacker Uprising, documenting my personal crusade to encourage more Americans to vote in presidential elections. These experiences underpinned my conviction that it is the duty of a free press to probe, and hold government and the powerful to account – and that citizens must be properly informed and have access to information in order to exercise their democratic rights.

4. Governments have always been discomfited by a probing press. With the hollowing out of newsrooms, in large part as a consequence of the new digital world, old media have largely abandoned the territory of investigative journalism.

5. I support Julian, whom I see as a pioneer of free speech, transparent government and the digital revolution in journalism. His commitment to exposing the follies of government and business offers the greater society a chance to protect itself from these follies. Some aren't just follies. Some are crimes. What do we do with someone who informs the authorities -- and in this case it is the free people in a democracy who are the "authorities" -- that a crime has been committed? Do we arrest HIM? Do we try to shut his mouth? Do we hound him, threaten him, track him down and hunt him as if HE is the criminal? He bravely informed the citizenry of what was being done in their name and with their tax monies. That is no crime. That is an act of patriotism. He should be thanked and honored, not abused and jailed. It dishonours this court to be used in this way, holding this man without bail. Julian has made the world, and my country in particular, a safer place. His actions with WikiLeaks have put on notice those who would take us to war based on lies that any future attempts to do so will be met by the fierce bright light provided by WikiLeaks and intended to expose those who commit their war crimes. His actions will make them think twice next time -- and for that we all owe him a debt of gratitude.

6. I believe that Julian takes pride in his reputation and as any journalist would understands that if he were to abscond he would ruin his reputation in the media and journalism industries.

7. I regret that I am out of the country and therefore I am unable to attend court and explain in person that I expect Julian to observe his bail conditions. I am offering to stand and provide security for him abiding by his bail conditions to the value of USD$20,000.

8. I understand that by acting as security for Julian I risk forfeiture of the aforementioned sum to the crown if he breaches his bail conditions by absconding or by not attending Court as and when required.

9. The money which I will pay to the Court, to be held as security, is my own. As I am abroad I am unable to produce any statement as evidence of these funds. However I have already transferred the sum of USD$20,000 into the client account of FSI.

10. I have not been indemnified against the loss of this money in the event of Julian breaching his bail conditions, and understand that if I were to be so indemnified it would amount to a separate criminal offence for which I could be imprisoned.

11. I have been advised by Julian’s solicitors that it would be prudent to obtain independent legal advice in relation to my liabilities as security.

12. I have no previous convictions.

===

Monday, December 13, 2010

Whistleblowers' Bill: Check This Out!



WHISTLEBLOWER JEFFREY WIGAND WITH SIXTY MINUTES' MIKE WALLACE:
WIGAND TESTIFIED THAT RAT POISON WAS BEING PLACED IN CIGARETTES TO MAKE THEM MORE ADDICTIVE...AND HE WAS RIGHT!
SIXTY MINUTES WAS AFRAID TO RUN THE SEGMENT--AND WIGAND RECEIVED THREATS AND LOST HIS JOB. THE FILM "THE INSIDER" WITH RUSSELL CROW WAS MADE ABOUT WIGAND AND THE SUFFERINGS HE WENT THROUGH.
WIGAND'S ACTIONS SAVED MANY LIVES AND EXPOSED THE FACT THAT TOBACCO INDUSTRIES WERE MAKING TOBACCO MORE ADDICTIVE, DESPITE LUNG CANCER AND OTHER DANGERS ASSOCIATED WITH SMOKING. HIS REWARD? THIS HIGHLY-PAID INDUSTRIAL CHEMIST AND SPECIALIST LOST HIS FAMILY, HIS HOME, HIS PRESTIGIOUS POSITION, RECEIVED THREATS, AND BECAME A HIGH SCHOOL CHEMISTRY TEACHER.

BUT IT SEEMS THAT NOW WHISTLEBLOWERS SUCH AS JEFFREY WIGAND, IN THE USA, WILL LOSE THE SLIGHT PROTECTION THEY HAVE. READ THIS!!! AND ACT!!!


IS THIS THE END OF THE LINE FOR WHISTLEBLOWERS? GOD HELP US!




WITHOUT PROTECTION, CORRUPTION, WASTE,AND CRIME IN GOVERNMENT AND THE WORKPLACE CANNOT BE SAFELY REPORTED.

REF: http://www.capwiz.com/whistleblowers/issues/alert/?alertid=20736501&type=co
Senate Passes Bill That Destroys Existing Whistleblower Rights
The Senate passed the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act (S. 372) on Friday, December, 10th, by unanimous consent. As the National Whistleblowers Center has repeatedly stated S. 372 is a bad deal for whistleblowers. There are two poison pills in the bill that fundamentally undermine the small advances in the bill. There is still time to fix the bill.

TAKE ACTION! Stop the repeal of existing whistleblower rights

For the first time ever, federal employees will not be protected for blowing the whistle on a violation of law. The excuse given to justify this dangerous rollback is that it only excludes minor violations of law. The fact is there is no such thing as a minor violation of law. Either it is violation of the law or it is not. Federal managers should not be allowed to decide what laws they can violate.

In fact, this provision overturns one of few Federal Court decisions in 30 years that ordered corrective action for a whistleblower. The provision also runs counter to every major study on how to detect fraud, including the most recent study by the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. These studies have found that the best way to detect fraud is to protect whistleblowers who report even suspicious activity because it is often the suspicious activity that leads to the discovery of major fraud.

TAKE ACTION! Demand that House fix the Senate bill before final passage

The second major rollback in the Senate bill is the increased power given to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). Instead of reforming the broken MSPB, for the first time in history the Senate has given the Board the ability to summarily dismiss a whistleblowers case without ever having a hearing. The House resisted efforts in 1978 to give the MSPB this tremendous authority and should continue to do so today.

These two dangerous rollbacks in existing whistleblower protections can be fixed in the House and sent back to the Senate. We cannot allow another generation of whistleblowers to suffer. Urge the House to continue to stand up for real whistleblower protections and fix the Senate bill before passing it.

Whistleblowers were promised enhanced protections. We will not stand by silently and watch Congress destroy existing whistleblowers rights so that they can say they passed something for whistleblowers. Please help us protect whistleblowers by taking action and then passing this alert on to your friends and family.
==

Famous Whistleblowers
(Ref: http://www.onlinelawyersource.com/whistleblower/famous/)

Several stories of famous whistleblowers abound in the U.S. press. Individuals who stand up and blow the whistle against companies and or government entities who have engaged in egregious law-breaking conduct are considered to be courageous and heroic by many Americans.

Famous Whistleblowers in U.S.
Here is a brief list of the most famous whistleblowers in recent U.S. history, but hundreds of lesser-known or even anonymous whistleblowers have come forward to reveal wrongdoing in our workplaces and government. Their actions are just as admirable.

Frank Serpico: The first (in the late '60s) and most famous police officer to report widespread corruption in a police department (New York City's), he risked his life to come forward.

Daniel Ellsberg: He risked severe pressure and retaliation from the federal government in 1971 when he leaked the "Pentagon Papers" to The New York Times, revealing the secret pretexts for the war in Vietnam. He was a U.S. State Department analyst before becoming a whistleblower.

"Deep Throat" (now known to be the late W. Mark Felt): He gave Washington Post reporters the information about then-President Nixon's involvement in the Watergate illegalities in 1972. This whistleblowing eventually led to Nixon's resignation from office and prison terms for two members of his staff.

Karen Silkwood: In 1974, she exposed serious safety violations at her workplace, a nuclear plant in Oklahoma. The film "Silkwood" is an account of her story; her death at the wheel of her car as she was driving to meet a reporter has been alleged to be a homicide.

Jeffrey Wigand: In 1996, Wigand blew the whistle on the cigarette industry when he revealed the intentional manipulation of nicotine, known as "impact boosting," by his former employer, Brown & Williamson, in an interview on the television program 60 Minutes.


Linda Tripp: She told the Office of Independent Counsel that her friend had committed perjury — starting the whole "Monica Lewinsky affair" in 1998. The Clinton administration then leaked personal information about her, and she successfully pursued a lawsuit based on this violation of the Privacy Act of 1974.


Sherron Watkins: An Enron whistleblower and former vice president, she exposed the highly irregular accounting methods being used by the company to hide the true state of its financial affairs in 2001. Enron later filed the largest corporate bankruptcy on record — too late for investors, unfortunately.

Coleen Rowley: A special agent with the FBI, she revealed the agency's inaction and mistakes that may have allowed the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

Are You Considering Blowing the Whistle?

==MAYBE YOU DO NOT DARE, NOW!==

Saturday, December 11, 2010

CORRUPTION IN 2010, and One BLOGGER'S DEMAND FOR TRUE CHANGE

THE WORLD'S LEAST CORRUPT COUNTRIES, ACCORDING TO TRANSPARENCY.ORG, ARE DENMARK, NEW ZEALAND, SINGAPORE,FINLAND, AND SWEDEN.
THESE COUNTRIES HAVE BEEN AT THE TOP FOR QUITE SOME TIME,ALONG WITH NORWAY AND SWITZERLAND.

CHILE HAS STEADILY RISEN HIGHER AND HIGHER: IT WAS #25 IN 2009, AND NOW IS #21, ABOVE THE USA (#22), DESPITE ITS BEING NEXT-DOOR TO HIGHLY CORRUPT ARGENTINA (MUCH AS WE ARE NEXT-DOOR TO HIGHLY-CORRUPT MEXICO).

WE'RE SLIDING DOWNHILL...GOING OUT, WITHOUT A WHIMPER?
IN 2005, NATIONMASTER'S STATISTICS SHOWED THE USA RANKED #17. IN 2009, IT RANKED #19. TODAY,IT'S #22, UNDER THE UNITED KINGDOM, CHILE AND BELGIUM, AND JUST ABOVE URUGUAY, FRANCE AND ESTONIA.
THAT'S THE WRONG DIRECTION.
America Rising
(REF: http://corruptgovernment2010.blogspot.com/)

The people are hurting. They cannot be fooled forever. The sad fact is that corruption leads to revolution. It can be peaceful, or it can be otherwise. Currently, all over the Internet, discontented Americans are saying tings I thought I'd never read in print.

Here's one example:

"America Rising"

Today the people of America set into motion the plans for a new beginning.
For decades we have stood idle by with our eyes and minds closed, while our leaders, the elite, rip this country apart.
Little by little they have taken away everything that our blood sweat and tears have worked hard to achieve.
We have always believed and trusted in the values that our Country was founded on, so for decades we waited with great virtue and patience.
We put our trust and our livelihood in the hands of our leaders with confidence and without worry; we were betrayed and we were used, as a means to a greater power for them, not for us.
Now their intentions are clear.
Now we can see the malicious acts applied against true Americans.

I want to be perfectly clear to every man woman and child:
America has fallen in the hands of tyrants, and they are stripping us of everything we have.
It is time to stand up to these barbarians and take back our Country.
No longer will we allow Tyrants to nibble away at the heart of America.
No longer will we bow down to a system of corporate giants and corrupt Government tyrants, who live the life of kings and look down on us as mere peasants.

This is our country and we will take back what has been taken from us.
Enough is enough and from this day forward, We the People are putting our lives on the line, for ourselves and for our children.
We are aware of the massive wall of resistance we will encounter, which will include a mainstream media smear campaign designed to stop the popular outrage against the Government.
We (AMERICANS) will be labeled as potential terrorists, racists and traitors, but this label will not change our direction.

We will not give in to tyranny.

This mass group of tyrants is powerful, persuasive, and manipulative and will use any means necessary to remain in control.

We will be wise and learn from their past strategy-- and that is the tactics of false flag operations, which would be designed to deceive the public in such a way that it appears we the people are responsible for whatever violent acts they portray.

No matter what oppositions we face we will endure and we will succeed.

Soon we will see this country flourishing as our founding fathers intended.

Soon we will sleep sounder knowing our children will not wake up tomorrow to a life of poverty.

We are not concerned with mending our current Government; rather we are instituting a new Government, one for the people, of the people and by the people.

Our third president Thomas Jefferson was attributed with these quotes; whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends [life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness] it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government...Thomas Jefferson (The Declaration of Independence)

The will of the people is the only legitimate foundation of any government, and to protect its free expression should be our first objective. Thomas Jefferson3rd president of US (1743 - 1826)

I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs. Thomas Jefferson, (Attributed) 3rd president of US (1743 - 1826)

President Thomas Jefferson somehow knew what was about to happen and he tried to warn us.

We will not be duly criticized for carrying out the actions necessary to restore control back in the hands of the American people.

I speak now to the members of our current Government; the people have spoken and it has been decided; we cannot correct the current Government structure from within the system as it is now; therefore it is an order of the people that the President and all members of Congress resign immediately.

This is not a request but an executive order of the people.

You can smirk now and ignore this order and refer to it as an outlandish request by a group of American idiots or whatever label you give us.

You can manipulate our Armed forces turning them against us by means of media smear tactics, and you can seek out our leaders and have them silenced.

You can do these atrocities as I know you will; however, the day will come and it will be soon, that you will be in no position to disobey our order.

We are the people and our numbers are greater, our will is stronger and our pursuit of happiness is unbending.

We are coming for you and we will not stop until America is restored and back in the hands of the people where it belongs.

In God We Trust."

I,myself, have been maligned on the Internet, and there is always the chance that this blog post will be attributed to me. However, I am simply the messenger of the bad news.

People have lost their trust in government.

I pray that reform can be made, before it's too late, before great sufferings ensue.

I am deeply ashamed that AMERICA THE BEAUTIFUL should not carry the highest rank as a 'clean country'on the face of the earth.

We know that honesty in government leads to a happy and contented people.

Ranked #22 in a world where corruption is rampant?

How can this be?

How did it happen?

it's an old mantra, but tried and true: we need to support the family, we need to issue our own money, we need our coins made of pure silver again, we need to stop enforcing a PAX AMERICANA on a world that is learning to hate us; we must get rid of secret societies and secrecy in government. As John F.Kennedy said, we must smash the CIA into a thousand pieces and start anew, with intelligence gathering --not execution by drones or with 'license to kill' taking out whomever the President (or others behind the scenes) wishes, as the prime directive. Freedom of speech, freedom of the press-these rights are priceless in a free nation.

But I say too much,in an age where anything you say apparently can be held against you.

Friday, December 10, 2010

WIKILEAKS WOULDN'T EXIST IF WE HAD HONESTY IN GOVERNMENT! --THE PEOPLE CRY OUT! RON PAUL AND FEDUPUSA.ORG

JULIAN ASSANGE --JAILED OVER CONDOM ISSUES,EASY PREY FOR EXTRADITION TO THE U.S.A.


WIKILEAKS' FOUNDER IS IN JAIL IN LONDON OVER A CONDOMS USAGE ISSUE--NO, IT WASN'T RAPE, AS REPORTED SHAMELESSLY BY THE PRESS FOR MONTHS. A PAIR OF CONNIVING HONEYPOTS CAUGHT HIM, WHOSE LINKS TO U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES ARE TRACEABLE. WHAT WILL SWEDEN DO WITH ASSANGE? HAND HIM OVER TO THE U.S. AS A 'TRAITOR'? THE MEDIA ALSO SHAMELESSLY STATED THAT A MANHUNT WAS ON FOR ASSANGE, WHEN EVERYBODY OVER HERE IN EUROPE KNEW EXACTLY WHERE HE WAS LOCATED. A LIE--THAT HE WAS IN HIDING!--RIGHT IN FRONT OF OUR EYES! THE MEDIA IS SO PREJUDICED THAT MY BOOK, ME & LEE: HOW I CAME TO KNOW,LOVE AND LOSE LEE HARVEY OSWALD -- A USEFUL KEY TO UNDERSTANDING THE KENNEDY ASSASSINATION AND HOW OUR GOVERNMENT WAS ILLEGALLY OVERWHELMED IN A COUP D'ETAT-- WILL PROBABLY NEVER RECEIVE AN HONEST MAINSTREAM REVIEW. HOW COULD IT?

MEDIA BIAS -- FAILING TO SPEAK THE TRUTH DUE TO GOVERNMENT AND MONETARY PRESSURES --HAS HELPED DESTROY MY BELOVED COUNTRY. I NOTICE THAT CNN CALLS ITS NEWS SEGMENTS "THE SHOW." THE NEWS USED TO BE CALLED "A PROGRAM." NOT A "SHOW." THINK ABOUT THAT.

ASSANGE IS BEING PILLORIED FOR PROVIDING AN OUTLET FOR WHISTLEBLOWERS. AN OUTLET THAT WOULD NOT BE NECESSARY IF WE HAD A FREE PRESS. BUT WE DON'T: THE PRESS IS OWNED BY A FEW COMPANIES WITH VESTED INTERESTS IN KEEPING SECRETS.

SECRECY IS THE STUFF OF WARS, MY PEOPLE.

WE HAVE HAD ENOUGH SECRECY TO DESTROY AMERICA AND COUNTLESS INNOCENT PEOPLE ELSEWHERE OVER THE PAST DECADE.

WE HAVE SEEN THE EROSION OF FREEDOM, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND OF AMERICAN VALUES. OUR LEADERS IN BOTH 'PARTIES' HAVE BETRAYED OUR COUNTRY AND OUR GOD-GIVEN AMERICAN PRINCIPLES. THEY HAVE GROWN WEALTHY AS WE HAVE SUFFERED.

I WILL NEVER FORGET TALKING TO A POOR COUPLE IN ORLANDO, FLORIDA, WHO WERE SITTING ON THEIR PORCH STEPS, EXHAUSTED AFTER BOTH HAD PUT IN 12-HOUR WORKDAYS. THEY SADLY TOLD ME THEY WOULD NEVER BE ABLE TO AFFORD TO HAVE A CHILD. THEY COULDN'T EVEN GET HEALTH INSURANCE. IF AMERICA'S EMPLOYERS WERE NOT ALLOWED TO FORCE THEIR EMPLOYEES TO WORK OVERTIME, MILLIONS OF JOBS WOULD ONCE MORE BE OPEN TO THE PEOPLE.

OF COURSE, WE WOULD ALSO HAVE TO START MANUFACTURING GOODS AGAIN, AND TAXING IMPORTS FROM CHINA AND INDIA THAT INSURE MORE MONEY FLOWS OUT OF AMERICA THAN ENTERS IT.

THE GOOD, HARD-WORKING PEOPLE OF AMERICA DESERVE RESPECT,JOBS, SOCIAL SECURITY, HEALTH CARE EQUAL TO WHAT THEIR CONGRESSMEN GET--AND ABOVE ALL--THEY DESERVE TO KNOW THE TRUTH, WHICH SEEMS ONLY COMES TO THEM THROUGH SUCH SOURCES AS WIKILEAKS.

THERE ARE FEW IN GOVERNMENT WHO "TELL IT LIKE IT IS" --BUT ONE SUCH PERSON IS RON PAUL.

RON PAUL HAS THE COURAGE TO APPLAUD WHISTLEBLOWERS. HE ASKED, WHY SHOULD A WHISTLEBLOWER BE LOCKED UP FOR TELLING THE TRUTH?

RON PAUL COMES FROM HOUSTON, TEXAS--A DOCTOR WHO DECIDED TO BECOME AN ACTIVE PATRIOT --AND I VOTED FOR HIM MANY TIMES WHEN I LIVED IN HOUSTON.

HE DESERVES THE ACCLAIM HE HAS RECEIVED FOR HIS COURAGE AND INTEGRITY.

HERE'S RON PAUL'S STATEMENTS ABOUT WIKILEAKS, WHICH I THOROUGHLY APPLAUD:



"THE CHAOS [IN AFGHANISTAN] IS BECAUSE WE'RE THERE--" HE SAYS. "IT'LL STOP WHEN WE MARCH OUT." "AMERICA IS NOT ABOUT AGGRESSION..."

THE INTERNET IS FILLED WITH PEOPLE USING THE SAME WORDS-- "FED UP!" -- TO DESCRIBE THEIR ANGER AND PAIN AT GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION AND FAKERY.

MORE AND MORE, BLOGS ARE CARRYING THOSE TWO WORDS, CRYING OUT THEIR PAIN.

THE PEOPLE CRY OUT, BUT OUR CORRUPT POLITICIANS ARE IGNORING THEM.

HOW DARE "TAX CUTS" BE EXTENDED TO THE VERY RICH, UNDER THE GUISE OF "THEY WILL CREATE MORE JOBS BECAUSE THEY'LL HAVE MORE MONEY TO DO SO"!

THEY HAVE SENT AMERICAN JOBS OVERSEAS WHERE CHEAPER LABOR GIVES THEM MORE MONEY.

THEY HAVE FILLED THEIR POCKETS WITH FREE HEALTHCARE, WHILE STRIPPING THE SAME HEALTHCARE BENEFITS FROM THE PEOPLE.

THEY HAVE "BAILED OUT" BANKS FILLED WITH CORRUPTION AND FAT ON DEREGULATION, WHILE IGNORING MILLIONS OF GOOD AMERICANS WHO ARE LOSING THEIR HOMES TO THOSE SAME BANKS.

THEY WAGE WARS FOR PROFIT, SPILLING THE BLOOD OF OUR PRECIOUS TROOPS AND CREATING ENEMIES WHO HATE US.

THE PEOPLE CRY OUT AGAINST THESE ATROCITIES AND THE POLITICIANS WHO VOTE THEMSELVES RAISES, TAKE BRIBES FROM LOBBYISTS, AND WHO ARE ALLOWED TO RECEIVE ENDLESS PAYMENTS FROM BIG COMPANIES TO DO THEIR BIDDING.

FedUpUSA.org DEFINES WHAT'S HAPPENED TO US, THROUGH A MASS OF CORRUPT ACTIONS THAT ARE ALMOST UNBELIEVABLE:





Are The Federal Reserve’s Crimes Too Big To Comprehend?

Just when I thought the banksters couldn’t possibly shock me anymore… they did.
We were finally granted the honor and privilege of finding out the specifics, a limited one-time Federal Reserve view, of a secret taxpayer funded “backdoor bailout” by a small group of unelected bankers. This data release reveals “emergency lending programs” that doled out $12.3 TRILLION in taxpayer money – $3.3 trillion in liquidity, $9 trillion in “other financial arrangements.”

Wait, what? Did you say $12.3 TRILLION tax dollars were thrown around in secrecy by unelected bankers… and Congress didn’t know any of the details?
Yes. The Founding Fathers are rolling over in their graves. The original copy of the Constitution spontaneously burst into flames. The ghost of Tom Paine went running, stark raving mad screaming through the halls of Congress.
The Federal Reserve was secretly throwing around our money in unprecedented fashion, and it wasn’t just to the usual suspects like Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Citigroup, Bank of America, etc.; it was to the entire Global Banking Cartel. To central banks throughout the world: Australia, Denmark, Japan, Mexico, Norway, South Korea, Sweden, Switzerland, England… To the Fed’s foreign primary dealers like Credit Suisse (Switzerland), Deutsche Bank (Germany), Royal Bank of Scotland (U.K.), Barclays (U.K.), BNP Paribas (France)… All their Ponzi players were “gifted.” All the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations got their cut.
Talk about the ransacking and burning of Rome! Sayonara American middle class…
If you still had any question as to whether or not the United States is now the world’s preeminent banana republic, the final verdict was just delivered and the decision was unanimous. The ayes have it.
Any fairytale notions that we are living in a nation built on the rule of law and of the global economy being based on free market principles has now been exposed as just that, a fairytale. This moment is equivalent to everyone in Vatican City being told, by the Pope, that God is dead.
I’ve been arguing for years that the market is rigged and that the major Wall Street firms are elaborate Ponzi schemes, as have many other people who built their beliefs on rational thought, reasoned logic and evidence. We already came to this conclusion by doing the research and connecting the dots. But now, even our strongest skeptics and the most ardent Wall Street supporters have it all laid out in front of them, on FEDERAL RESERVE SPREADSHEETS.
Even the Financial Times, which named Lloyd Blankfein its 2009 person of the year, reacted by reporting this: “The initial reactions were shock at the breadth of lending, particularly to foreign firms. But the details paint a bleaker and even more disturbing picture.”

Yes, the emperor doesn’t have any clothes. God is, indeed, dead. But, for the moment at least, the illusion continues to hold power. How is this possible?
To start with, as always, the US television “news” media (propaganda) networks just glossed over the whole thing – nothing to see here, just move along, back after a message from our sponsors… Other than that obvious reason, I’ve come to the realization that the Federal Reserve’s crimes are so big, so huge in scale, it is very hard for people to even wrap their head around it and comprehend what has happened here.
Think about it. In just this one peek we got at its operations, we learned that the Fed doled out $12.3 trillion in near-zero interest loans, without Congressional input.
The audacity and absurdity of it all is mind boggling…
Based on many conversations I’ve had with people, it seems that the average person doesn’t comprehend how much a trillion dollars is, let alone 12.3 trillion. You might as well just say 12.3 gazillion, because people don’t grasp a number that large, nor do they understand what would be possible if that money was used in other ways.
Can you imagine what we could do to restructure society with $12.3 trillion? Think about that…
People also can’t grasp the colossal crime committed because they keep hearing the word “loans.” People think of the loans they get. You borrow money, you pay it back with interest, no big deal.
That’s not what happened here. The Fed doled out $12.3 trillion in near-zero interest loans, using the American people as collateral, demanding nothing in return, other than a bunch of toxic assets in some cases. They only gave this money to a select group of insiders, at a time when very few had any money because all these same insiders and speculators crashed the system.
Do you get that? The very people most responsible for crashing the system, were then rewarded with trillions of our dollars. This gave that select group of insiders unlimited power to seize control of assets and have unprecedented leverage over almost everything within their economies – crony capitalism on steroids.

This was a hostile world takeover orchestrated through economic attacks by a very small group of unelected global bankers. They paralyzed the system, then were given the power to recreate it according to their own desires. No free market, no democracy of any kind. All done in secrecy. In the process, they gave themselves all-time record-breaking bonuses and impoverished tens of millions of people – they have put into motion a system that will inevitably collapse again and utterly destroy the very existence of what is left of an economic middle class.
That is not hyperbole. That is what happened.
We are talking about trillions of dollars secretly pumped into global banks, handpicked by a small select group of bankers themselves. All for the benefit of those bankers, and at the expense of everyone else. People can’t even comprehend what that means and the severe consequences that it entails, which we have only just begun to experience.
Let me sum it up for you: The American Dream is O-V-E-R.
Welcome to the neo-feudal-fascist state.
People throughout the world who keep using the dollar are either A) Part of the scam; B) Oblivious to reality; C) Believe that US military power will be able to maintain the value of an otherwise worthless currency; D) All of the above.
No matter which way you look at it, we are all in serious trouble!
If you are an elected official, (I know at least 17 of you subscribe to my newsletter) and you believe in the oath you took upon taking office, you must immediately demand a full audit of the Federal Reserve and have Ben Bernanke and the entire Federal Reserve Board detained. If you are not going to do that, you deserve to have the words “Irrelevant Puppet” tattooed across your forehead.
Yes, those are obviously strong words, but they are the truth.

The Global Banking Cartel has now been so blatantly exposed, you cannot possibly get away with pretending that we live in a nation of law based on the Constitution. The jig is up.
It’s been over two years now; does anyone still seriously not understand why we are in this crisis? Our economy has been looted and burnt to the ground due to the strategic, deliberate decisions made by a small group of unelected global bankers at the Federal Reserve. Do people really not get the connection here? I mean, H.E.L.L.O. Our country is run by an unelected Global Banking Cartel.

====

THE PEOPLE CRY OUT--AND BELOW ARE SOME OF THEIR MESSAGES, SKIMMED FROM ACROSS THE INTERNET.

READ THESE MESSAGES -- AND CRY FOR OUR COUNTRY.


YouknowI'mright

My generation will be working ourselves to death, and when we can't work anymore I guess we'll be taken out and shot like an old swaybacked horse, and our flesh will be fed to McDonalds beef cows or used as fertilizer at Monsanto's Geneti-farms

--

No wonder some people go underground disappearing from the face of earth with no track records earning their $$$ underground because the government CANNOT be trusted. A broken system = broken trust.

---

didn't want to take my social security at 62 but had no choice due to unemployment. I have been looking for a job for a year and a half. I'm not one of those who fake it - I really look and network and nothing yet. Raising the $14,161.00 ceiling somewhat higher would help and if you find a full time job you can suspend your social security benefits. The only problem with that is if you do then go back to apply will it be there? These are times of major insecurity and we all are puppets and the politician fat cats don't give a crap what happens as long as they are elected and re-elected. We have GOT to start making better choices of who represents us. God Bless America!

----

The Republicans and conservative parts are the servants of business (oil, coal, banks, etc) and they never cared about us.
Getting rid of lobbyists would be a start and every member of the government is only allowed to accept their pay as an elected official. They can never receive any form of compensation ever, including gifts, jobs, etc to their families for 5 generation out, and 6 generation following. All compensation from companies and lobbyists to be given to the SS system to help boost it.
Then all of the money "borrowed" by the government from SS has to be put back into SS with 10 % interest...

====

what i have a problem with is all the money that congess has robbed from the system, by borrowing the money and never paying it back. then to add insult to injury, they have totally depleted the fund and then transferred all payments to the general fund to pay for other things not even remotely close to the true reason of our retirement funding. what i want is for congress to pay back every dime with interest that was removed in all the past years. then pass legislation to ban, by penalty, to never touch these funds again. it was never intended to be used or violated as has been done. there should never be anything new added to this fund that rubs from it, and if any changes are sought by anyone, make it manditory to be placed on a special ballot that only those paying into it are allowed to vote on. this should totally eliminate any further messing with the system; and add one more thing to the law: anyone robbing from s.s. will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. chuck

====

i hate that i got sick and had to stop working i draw disability,i get 1153.00 a month and 96.00 come out of my check for medicare and so i get 1053.00 a month,the government tells me this is enough for me to leave off of for a month,by the time i pay my rent and light bill i have 53.00 left to take me to the next month,i can not afford my medicine or my co-pay to the doctors but they tell me that we do not deserve a raise this yearthis is horrible i applied for food stamps,they tell me that i am eligible for 16.00 worth wow waht a big help. i have worked all of my life and when i need help i can not get any my utilities have been turned off so many times that i cannot count. i have seen a lot of foreign people in the store with 2 or 3 carts using food stamps where is the justice help the people here first .and a lot of these people in diffrent placeses or job that can help people they are so nasty to you they make you feel so nasty that you hate to ask for help. i do not want a hand out but please help the people that really need the help like older people anddisabled. thank you so much deborah taylor

====

What is it going to take to get these arrogent
slime balls out of our pockets?

====

Bernanke is working for a private corporation. Why is the depression systemic? Why are Americans out of work while the Federal Reserve funnels money to European interests?

What if you could see into the Matrix? Watch 'Secret of Oz,' 'Money as Debt,' and 'Creature from Jekyll Island' documentaries on youtube.

There is hope, especially here in America. History has shown that America has fought to create it’s own money for the last 300 years. In fact, in no other nation on earth has the population fought for it as successfully and with such determination over the centuries as America. All we need in the face of this oncoming first depression of the 21st century is a little education. We can make this the new civil rights movement – the new human rights movement. The big bankers now stand more exposed than ever before. Let’s use history to guide our path today.

====

They promise you benefits and steal your wages, then they give you change. What a bunch of weasels. They can keep their change. This kind of deal is the reason the economy will never recover. Mistrust of government does not produce prosperity.

====
John
The attack on SS has begun. Repubs will hand 700 Billion to the elite and use SS to 'pay' for it. The US is done.

====

just remember that the government continues to pick the meat from your bones until their is nothing left.

====

Jerry
lets take all this payback bailout money - put it into SS--wait that wont work obama cant spend it on some other crap

====

What about the money they (the GOVERNMENT) steals from the system to give to other countries will it ever be repayed or how about the money they steal from the notch babies ? Why do gov. workers recv. raises and then deny cost of living increases to SS recipients? Do they LIVE somewhere else?

====

Lets face it, can you imagine the debt we will be in 30 plus years from now? Maybe the Chinese will give us something becuse thiere going to own most of the U.S. by then.

====

you jerks in washington need to live on what i make a year.

===

LarryKegel(US Army)
... We are in Afghanistan because the MIC(military-industrial-complex) in Washington is making a lot of money out of this obnoxious war which to them is a big money maker!

===

Monday, December 6, 2010

IMPRESSED BY THE KENNEDY DETAIL ON THE DISCOVERY CHANNEL?



JFK PROTECTED





JFK'S NON-EXISTENT PROTECTION NOV. 22,1963: HILL JUMPS ON CAR AFTER THREE SHOTS RING OUT--NOBODY ELSE MOVES.



IMPRESSED by The Kennedy Detail on the Discovery Channel?

VINCE PALAMARA ON "THE KENNEDY DETAIL" has written on his YouTube presentations:

"JFK was a very nice man (as Blaine & many of his colleagues told me), never interfered with the actions of the Secret Service (as Blaine & many of his colleagues told me), and did not order the agents off his car (as Blaine & many of his colleagues told me)---DON'T BELIEVE THE LIES FOR BLOOD MONEY!"

HERE IS WHAT A FORMER SS AGENT POSTED ABOUT THE TV SPECIAL BASED ON THE BOOK:
(REF: http://www.jfklancerforum.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=3&topic_id=90433&mesg_id=90433&page)

Sat Dec-04-10 12:57 AM
by Randy Gunter



I think it is very easy to see this presentation from the “Warren Omission Channel” aka Discovery Channel, for what it is; An attempt by these remaining USSS agents to do a self-cleansing of their souls before they check out to meet their maker. These agents have waited 47 years to return to Dallas and basically address or disclose nothing? Why? Because they are still tormented by the Dealey Plaza Demons and Ghosts of November 22, 1963. Did you notice Win Lawson in his hospital room or convalescent home? He's on his deathbed and trying to exorcise the demons.

Like many others have said, they addressed none of the plethora of USSS issues that occurred during the Dallas Debacle but yet had the nerve to complain about “their workload”, “their long hours” and “their low pay” of 1963. Jerry Blaine made the comment “I was on poverty level, had I lived in Chicago.” I think this is a gross lie, his current day annual salary comes in around $65K.

Sorry fellows, if you’re looking for sympathy from me, it isn’t happening. You chose your job, and you failed miserably at it. If you didn’t like it, quit and move on to something else (Like Jerry “Complain” Blaine did after JFK was killed). He said he "walked out and later had regrets".

As a veteran of numerous USSS missions, I can speak personally to the life of a USSS agent. You have the prestige of protecting the most important person in the world and his family, and other heads of state. You travel to some of the most exotic and exciting places in the world. You stay in some of the best hotels, resorts, and eat some of the finest cuisine known to mankind. You have the US Government provide you with PERDIEM for travel and a clothing allowance to purchase business suits and wardrobe on top of your regular pay. You meet famous persons from all types of venues. You draw a federal retirement when you're eligible. How is this so bad again?

The USSS detail had a full day on November 21, 1963; Houston, San Antonio, and a return to Fort Worth at Midnight. So, what did they do? Go to sleep? No. They decided to make a long day the longest day by going out and staying out drinking and carousing until 5 or 6 in the a.m. on November 22nd. Then report for duty within 1-2 hours to protect the President. This ladies and gentlemen was “Dereliction of Duty” in it’s highest regard.

They were sworn to protect the President and his family, and prohibited from drinking alcohol while serving in this capacity. Whenever, I was performing a USSS mission, I was cautioned, counseled, whatever you wish to call it, that I if I was found to be drinking alcohol or drunk during a USSS mission (either by being caught in the act or the smell of alcohol on my breath), I would be court-martialed by the UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice).

Total Dereliction of Duty by these agents, but yet was anyone ever punished or reprimanded for their actions? No. They are viewed by some as “Heros”. Since when are the actions I have described, one of a “Hero”?

Clint Hill said the only way he came to understand and accept what happened in DP that fateful day was by admitting “That the shooter had the advantage that day.”

Oh really, Mr. Hill? If that isn’t the biggest copout I’ve ever heard, I don’t know what is. So you and your fellow USSS agents were doing all you could by staying out all night drinking, and by compromising the security and integrity of the parade route (i.e. By not posting agents or security in high threat and vulnerable areas such as the slow turns where open windows were prevalent and where cover and concealment were obvious threats (i.e. Grassy Knoll, Storm Drains, Open Building Windows), and by ordering agents not to react even when JFK was under attack?

Wow, I guess when you give all of those advantages away without a fight and saying that “The shooter had all the advantage that day”, you are correct Mr. Hill.

Randy


"A young man who does not have what it takes to perform military service is not likely to have what it takes to make a living." - John F. Kennedy

========

IT'S SO EASY TO BE IMPRESSED BY THESE TV SPECIALS.
YOU WON'T SEE A TV SPECIAL WHERE SECRET SERVICE SPECIALIST VINCENT PALAMARA STATES: "THERE WAS A CONSPIRACY...TRUTH IS, THE SECRET SERVICE...COULD HAVE PREVENTED THE ASSASSINATION..."


HOW TRUE!



YOUTUBE DIRECT: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eO6I9pA-UjI


JFK was a very nice man (as Blaine & many of his colleagues told me), never interfered with the actions of the Secret Service (as Blaine & many of his colleagues told me), and did not order the agents off his car (as Blaine & many of his colleagues told me)---DON'T BELIEVE THE LIES FOR BLOOD MONEY!



PALAMARA SAYS HE'S RECEIVED THREATS (I SURE UNDERSTAND HOW HE FEELS!)BUT HE HAS COME OUT WITH HIS LATEST YOUTUBE VIDEO ABOUT THE PROBLEMS WITH THE SECRET SERVICE'S VERSION OF WHY KENNEDY DIED THAT DAY

KENNEDY BASICALLY TOOK ORDERS FROM THE SECRET SERVICE AS TO SECURITY MEASURES!



ABOUT JACKIE KENNEDY, CLINT HILL SAID SHE WAS TRYING TO RETRIEVE A PIECE OF JFK'S HEAD. "IF WE HAD REACTED...FASTER..." HILL WOULD HAVE TAKEN KENNEDY'S SHOT...BUT HE WAS NOT STANDING ON THE BACK OF THE CAR.

"IF I HAD REACTED..."

VINCE PALAMARA INTERVIEWED CLINT HILL AND OTHER SECRET SERVICE AGENTS PERSONALLY.
I CONGRATULATE HIM ON HIS RESEARCH AND HIS WORK ON THESE YOUTUBE VIDEOS PRESENTING THE TRUTH. HE MAKES THE IMPORTANT COMMENT THAT THE USUAL PRESS CORPS VEHICLE THAT USUALLY TOOK PHOTOS OF THE PRESIDENT --BEING IN A CAR IN FRONT OF THE PRESIDENTIAL LIMO, HAD BEEN MOVED TO THE BACK OF THE PARADE. PALAMARA NOTES THAT THEREFORE ALL WE GOT WAS ZAPRUDER'S "RICKETY FILM." J

THE GOVERNMENT VERSION OF KENNEDY'S ASSASSINATION HAS BEEN SYSTEMATICALLY CONTAMINATED, DISTORTED, AND FULL OF LIES. WE WHO ARE WITNESSES, AND WE WHO ARE HONEST RESEARCHERS WITH ACCESS TO THE TRUTH, INSIST THAT YOU LEARN THE UNVARNISHED, REAL FACTS. IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT YOU DO, SO THAT YOU WILL BE WILLING TO TRACE THE ROOTS OF EVIL FROM THOSE WHO TOOK OVER OUR COUNTRY AND TO WHOM THEY HANDED OUR COUNTRY OVER, WITH THE PRESENT SAD RESULT: OUR COUNTRY WILL DIE WITHOUT THE TRUTH.